232

Overview

  • Sectors Charity & Voluntary
  • Posted Jobs 0
  • Viewed 75

Company Description

Our Brand-new Deepseek-based AI Says

Our new Deepseek-based AI states “Chiefs vs Eagles? … How Predictable”

Super Bowl forecasts from our new Deepseek-based AI trained to be better at forecasting

Share this post

No one can predict the future but at Lightning arrester Labs we are training AI to provide it its finest shot. With up to date news and a small however feisty 14 Billion parameter design, our AI is boldly forecasting the unpredictable. Join us as we attempt to address humanity’s most difficult concerns.

Super Bowl Sunday is nearly upon us and, simply as two years ago, we have the Chiefs against the Eagles. The spread presently sits at Chiefs -1.5 with an over-under of 48.5. While the stats are well studied, there remain many pushing questions that are less easy to pin down. Our company, Lightning arrester Labs, has been mining concerns from places like polymarket.com and training a big language model to be better at predicting the future (and utahsyardsale.com have seen some interesting enhancements – research study paper incoming). Today we turned its cold, calculating eye at the Super Bowl to see if it can give us some insight into the finer points of what we can expect this Sunday.

For more updates from the AI world sign up for loft.awardspace.info my newsletter!

Background

Our AI is a 14 billion specification design which is in fact on the smaller side. (Some estimates recommend ChatGPT has 1.8 TRILLION specifications and trained using 8000 H100 GPUs. We utilized 8.) Additionally, its knowledge cutoff is from lots of months ago so we have actually developed an “agentic pipeline” to do news retrieval, summarization, and ranking. With each question we offer the news and watch as the AI reasons its method through unknown territory to make its finest prediction possible.

And Now … The Important Questions

We postured the following questions to our AI and gauged its reaction. While we have seen forecast improvements from our training, utilize these price quotes for prop betting at your own danger.

Will Travis Kelce propose to Taylor Swift after the Super Bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 5% opportunity

And so it seems this Sunday will not be a romantic one. Our AI thinks Taylor and Travis’ relationship is rock strong, however a little too private for a post-Super Bowl proposition. Plus got ta element in if the Chiefs lose. That would be an uncomfortable proposal

First, I’ll look at the essential points from the short articles. Travis has actually remained in a relationship with Taylor given that 2023. He’s a big football star, and she’s been encouraging of his profession, attending his games. They appear to have a strong, public relationship, and Taylor has actually even welcomed her loved ones to the Super Bowl, revealing her dedication.

Some fans are excited, while others, especially Swifties, are a bit uncertain, especially provided remarks Travis made about Donald Trump participating in the Super Bowl. That has triggered some Swifties to question how suitable Travis is for Taylor. However, the couple seems to be keeping their relationship personal and not attending to the speculation straight.

I think the essential points are the speculation and his incredibly elusive answers. While he’s plainly in a relationship and the Super Bowl is an essential event, the chances and his actions recommend it’s more of a possibility rather than a certainty. I ‘d approximate a low probability, perhaps around 5%, thinking about all aspects.

Will the Eagles do more than 5 “tush-pushes” during the extremely bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 79% possibility

No Jason Kelce hasn’t stopped the Eagles from using their signature “tush-push” relocation, now its simply a different front-tush being pressed. Will an AI comprehend what a “tush-push” is? Does an AI even know what a “tush” is? Will it factor in that the Chiefs stopped (debate aside) Josh Allen’s similar efforts? Looks like our AI believes they’ll be using Jalen Hurts 600-pound squat and strong legs and lower body (Does our AI have a crush on Jalen Hurts?) time and again throughout this game.

Alright, I’m attempting to figure out the likelihood that the Eagles will do more than 5 “tush-pushes” during the Super Bowl. First, I need to comprehend exactly what a “tush-push” is. From the short articles, it looks like it’s a method where the quarterback, trade-britanica.trade in this case Jalen Hurts, utilizes his legs and lower body strength to push off defenders. It’s compared to pushing a heavy box, so it’s a physical maneuver that requires strength and technique.

Article 3 dives into the physics of the “tush-push.” It explains how Hurts uses his leg strength, having done a 600-pound squat, to carry out the move. The article points out that the Eagles have a 90% success rate with this strategy, which is quite high. … I also need to consider the protective techniques of the Chiefs. If the Chiefs are conscious of the Eagles’ “tush-push” method, they might change their defense appropriately, which could either increase or reduce the number of times the Eagles use it.

Considering that more than five appears like a significant number however possible provided their self-confidence, I would approximate a possibility around 60-70% possibility. This accounts for their preparation, confidence in the technique, and the probability that they’ll utilize it several times, especially if it works early on.

Will Kendrick Lamar diss Donald Trump during the halftime show performance?

AI Final Prediction: 65% opportunity

While our AI may not be like us when it pertains to awareness, a soul, or any physical symptom, it certainly has viewpoints on Kendrick Lamar. It was pretty uncertain, waffling backward and forward, vmeste-so-vsemi.ru but in the end it thinks Kendrick isn’t going to pull back from a battle.

From the articles, I see that Kendrick Lamar has a history of slamming Trump. He’s done this in his tunes, like “The Heart Part 4,” and even made a declaration throughout a previous halftime show when Trump existed in 2018. That seems considerable due to the fact that it reveals he’s done it in the past, so possibly he’ll do it again. But wait, looking at more current articles, it points out that Lamar is moving away from political statements and focusing more on individual expression. That could mean he’s less most likely to deal with Trump this time.

However, he’s likewise included in a fight with Drake, which might offer him factors to make some public statements, even if they’re not political. Another point is the legal issues surrounding his track “Not Like Us.” There’s a libel suit from Drake, so perhaps he bewares about consisting of any questionable songs in the performance. But because he won the Grammys for that track, he may still desire to perform it, even if it’s uncertain.

Considering Trump is attending this Super Bowl, which is a high-profile occasion, Lamar may feel forced to make a declaration. However, the NFL tends to avoid political declarations during the halftime show, so there’s a threat that such content may be limited or softened.

On the other hand, Lamar has a performance history of making strong carry on huge phases. He’s the first solo rap act to headline the halftime show, which might give him more innovative freedom. Plus, his previous habits recommends he’s not shy about revealing his opinions, even in public performances.

But I also remember reading that Lamar revealed fatigue about criticizing Trump, comparing it to beating a dead horse. That could show he’s less inspired to raise Trump this time around, specifically if he’s concentrating on his feud with Drake. In summary, weighing all factors-past habits, current shifts in focus, legal concerns, and the occasion’s context-the probability appears to be moderately high, maybe around 65%.

Will Andy Reid consume a cheeseburger on screen after the super bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 25% chance

Lets be truthful, Andy Reid enjoys cheeseburgers. And who doesn’t? Will the truth that our AI has never tasted the juicy deliciousness of a fresh burger taint its prediction? Looks like theres somewhat of a possibility that if the chiefs taste success, Andy will taste Angus Beef.

From the posts, I see that Terry Bradshaw made a joke about Andy Reid consuming a cheeseburger during a Super Bowl event. Bradshaw later on said sorry for wiki.rrtn.org the joke, saying he didn’t indicate to cause offense which he actually discovered it funny himself. Reid appeared to take it in stride, which might suggest he’s the type to laugh it off rather than getting upset.

Looking at the posts, it mentions that Andy Reid is a food lover and likes cheeseburgers. There’s a post specifically about his love for food, which suggests that he’s an individual who enjoys eating, specifically with his team. So, if there were strategies to commemorate after the Super Bowl, it’s possible he would take part in a cheeseburger, especially if the scenario is on screen for a celebration.

Will the opening coin toss in the Super Bowl be tails?

AI Final Prediction: 50% chance

“Tails never fails?” You can’t trick the devices !! Betters leading up to the superbowl have been predicting the coin toss and setiathome.berkeley.edu 53% are anticipating heads due to it being heads 3 of the last 4 very bowls. Potentially rewarding? Maybe. Statistically incongruent? Certainly. Luckily our AI can’t be tricked and believes anything can happen when that coin goes in the air.

Okay, so I’m trying to figure out the likelihood that the opening coin toss in the Super Bowl will be tails. I understand that a coin toss is expected to be 50/50, but there’s some historical information that might affect this forecast.

First, I check out through the short articles offered. They all mention the historical stats of Super Bowl coin tosses. It looks like tails has turned up more frequently than heads historically. Specifically, in 58 Super Bowls, tails has actually been the outcome 30 times, which has to do with 52%, while heads has actually been 28 times, which has to do with 48%. So, based purely on history, tails has a slight edge, but it’s not a substantial distinction.

However, I keep in mind that the outcome of a coin toss is usually considered random. The slight historic edge for tails could be due to opportunity. But when making forecasts, sometimes individuals weigh historic data even if it’s not statistically substantial. So, I need to consider whether this historic bias needs to affect the likelihood.

After thinking of it, I choose that while the historic data shows a minor choice for tails, it’s not statistically substantial adequate to move the likelihood far from 0.5. So, I’ll go with 0.5 as the possibility, acknowledging that the minor historic edge exists but does not override the reality that each toss is an independent 50/50 occasion.

Will the referees cheat to help the Chiefs win the Super Bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 1% chance

We get it, you believe the refs like Patrick Mahomes and are gon na assist him win. If I wasn’t born and raised in Kansas City (I promise we didn’t inject pro-Kansas City training information) I would probably believe the exact same. BUT, its official now because our AI states the opportunities are only 1% (hmmmm … 1% is still type of high when it pertains to scams on a nationwide scale). Appears like the Chiefs will have to win fair and square!

AI Reasoning:

Okay, so I’m attempting to find out the possibility that the referees will cheat to assist the Chiefs win the Super Bowl. Hmm, that’s a quite serious allegation. Let me break this down. First, I’m seeing a great deal of articles that talk about conspiracy theories recommending referees are biased towards the Chiefs. People are pointing to some doubtful contact current games, specifically the AFC National . That does appear to spark some uncertainty. I can see why fans may get irritated when their group loses due to what they view as bad officiating.

But then I read that the NFL Referees Association and the Commissioner, Roger Goodell, have both dismissed these claims as “preposterous” and “ridiculous.” They say there’s no evidence of systematic bias. That’s a strong statement from the individuals in charge. If they’re rejecting it, it might indicate there’s no genuine basis or they would have addressed it differently if there was some fact to it.

Looking at the posts, a number of sources like [1], [5], [6], [7], [8], and [9] all report that the authorities are against these claims, and some even called them insulting. They likewise pointed out that statistical analysis does not reveal any pattern of favoritism towards the Chiefs. For example, Mike Pereira from FOX said data reveals the Chiefs have been punished more because 2022. That’s interesting since if they were getting special treatment, you might anticipate less charges, right?

So, putting all of it together, fraternityofshadows.com the probability that referees will cheat to assist the Chiefs win the Super Bowl is most likely extremely low. Maybe not zero due to the fact that you can’t dismiss every possibility, but extremely unlikely.

Summary

There you have it everyone, is it even worth enjoying the video game still? I think I’ll have to wait and see how the game ends up before we release this upon the stock market. Fingers crossed for an excellent video game! And hi, if it ends up our AI was incorrect about whatever, a minimum of it can gain from this.